AWS vs Google Cloud (GCP) Compute Pricing
Side-by-side analysis of AWS EC2 and GCP Compute Engine. Explore cost differences between Graviton and Tau T2A, custom VM shapes, and Committed Use Discounts.
概要とクイックアンサー
Compare Amazon EC2 and Google Cloud Compute Engine instance pricing, custom sizing, and network performance. Google Cloud is frequently more flexible due to Custom Machine Types (allocating exact vCPU and RAM ratios without paying for unused capacity) and simpler Committed Use Discounts. AWS EC2 offers a broader selection of specialized instance families and a larger third-party marketplace.
総合ベストバリュー: Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
Google Cloud is frequently more flexible due to Custom Machine Types (allocating exact vCPU and RAM ratios without paying for unused capacity) and simpler Committed Use Discounts. AWS EC2 offers a broader selection of specialized instance families and a larger third-party marketplace.
最高のエコシステム: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
大規模な分散環境、エンタープライズコンプライアンス、マネージドクラウドエコシステムに推奨されます。
主なアーキテクチャの違い
Amazon Web Services (AWS)とGoogle Cloud Platform (GCP)のアーキテクチャ、帯域幅、価格ポリシーの比較。
| 比較項目 | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Google Cloud Platform (GCP) | 概要 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Sizing | Fixed instance sizes (nano, micro, small, medium, large, etc.) | Custom VM shapes allowing arbitrary vCPU and RAM allocations | GCP lets you avoid overprovisioning by sizing VMs precisely to your application need. |
| Discount Commitments | Savings Plans & Reserved Instances | Resource-based & Spend-based Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) | GCP CUDs apply flexibly without locking into specific instance generations. |
| Networking Performance | Enhanced Networking (ENA) | Google Premium Tier global private fiber backbone | Google operates its own global fiber network, reducing cross-region network latency. |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) — 最安サーバープラン
Amazon Web Services (AWS)の検証済み価格とスペック。
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) — 最安サーバープラン
Google Cloud Platform (GCP)の検証済み価格とスペック。
関連するクラウド価格ガイドを見る
別のリージョン、プロバイダー、スペック構成、ワークロード設計を比較します。
その他のクラウドインフラ比較
Hetzner is dramatically cheaper (often 70% to 85% less) for raw compute, memory, and bandwidth, making it the top choice for startups and cost-conscious teams. AWS is recommended when you require a massive managed service ecosystem (RDS, Lambda, SQS), strict compliance certifications, or global reach in 30+ countries.
AWS and Azure are closely matched in compute pricing and global coverage. AWS offers a slight edge in Linux Graviton price-performance and mature developer tooling, while Azure provides massive cost savings for Windows Server and SQL Server workloads via Azure Hybrid Benefit.
Hetzner offers unbeatable raw compute and RAM value (2x to 4x more resources per dollar compared to DigitalOcean), while DigitalOcean provides a broader suite of developer-friendly managed products (Managed Databases, App Platform, Kubernetes) and a larger North American and Asian footprint.
DigitalOcean and Linode offer nearly identical entry-level pricing ($4-$6/mo for 1GB VPS). Linode excels in raw CPU clock speeds and seamless integration with Akamai’s enterprise CDN and DDoS edge, while DigitalOcean leads in PaaS developer experience and documentation.
DigitalOcean provides predictable, flat-rate pricing with generous bandwidth and minimal overhead, making it ideal for small-to-medium teams. AWS is best suited for complex distributed architectures that require extensive compliance, enterprise IAM, and specialized hardware.
Google Cloud offers superior pricing flexibility with Custom Machine Types and sustained use discounts, whereas Azure is the clear winner for Microsoft ecosystem integration, enterprise active directory, and hybrid cloud environments.
よくある質問
クラウドコンピュートの価格とインフラに関する一般的な疑問への直接の回答。
Which is cheaper: AWS EC2 or Google Compute Engine? ▼
Base on-demand prices are very close, but GCP can be 15% to 25% cheaper in practice by utilizing Custom Machine Types to avoid paying for excess RAM or CPU cores that your workload does not need.