AWS vs Google Cloud (GCP) Compute Pricing
Side-by-side analysis of AWS EC2 and GCP Compute Engine. Explore cost differences between Graviton and Tau T2A, custom VM shapes, and Committed Use Discounts.
Résumé Exécutif et Réponse Rapide
Compare Amazon EC2 and Google Cloud Compute Engine instance pricing, custom sizing, and network performance. Google Cloud is frequently more flexible due to Custom Machine Types (allocating exact vCPU and RAM ratios without paying for unused capacity) and simpler Committed Use Discounts. AWS EC2 offers a broader selection of specialized instance families and a larger third-party marketplace.
Meilleur Rapport Qualité-Prix Global: Google Cloud Platform (GCP)
Google Cloud is frequently more flexible due to Custom Machine Types (allocating exact vCPU and RAM ratios without paying for unused capacity) and simpler Committed Use Discounts. AWS EC2 offers a broader selection of specialized instance families and a larger third-party marketplace.
Meilleur Écosystème Géré: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Recommandé pour les grands environnements distribués, la conformité d'entreprise et les écosystèmes cloud propriétaires managés.
Différences Architecturales Clés
Comparaison de l'architecture, de la bande passante et des politiques tarifaires entre Amazon Web Services (AWS) et Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
| Dimension | Amazon Web Services (AWS) | Google Cloud Platform (GCP) | Résumé |
|---|---|---|---|
| Custom Sizing | Fixed instance sizes (nano, micro, small, medium, large, etc.) | Custom VM shapes allowing arbitrary vCPU and RAM allocations | GCP lets you avoid overprovisioning by sizing VMs precisely to your application need. |
| Discount Commitments | Savings Plans & Reserved Instances | Resource-based & Spend-based Committed Use Discounts (CUDs) | GCP CUDs apply flexibly without locking into specific instance generations. |
| Networking Performance | Enhanced Networking (ENA) | Google Premium Tier global private fiber backbone | Google operates its own global fiber network, reducing cross-region network latency. |
Amazon Web Services (AWS) — Forfaits de Serveurs les Moins Chers
Tarifs et spécifications vérifiés pour Amazon Web Services (AWS).
Google Cloud Platform (GCP) — Forfaits de Serveurs les Moins Chers
Tarifs et spécifications vérifiés pour Google Cloud Platform (GCP).
Explorer les Guides de Tarification Cloud Connexes
Comparez les régions alternatives, fournisseurs, niveaux de configuration et architectures de charge de travail.
Autres Comparaisons d'Infrastructure Cloud
Hetzner is dramatically cheaper (often 70% to 85% less) for raw compute, memory, and bandwidth, making it the top choice for startups and cost-conscious teams. AWS is recommended when you require a massive managed service ecosystem (RDS, Lambda, SQS), strict compliance certifications, or global reach in 30+ countries.
AWS and Azure are closely matched in compute pricing and global coverage. AWS offers a slight edge in Linux Graviton price-performance and mature developer tooling, while Azure provides massive cost savings for Windows Server and SQL Server workloads via Azure Hybrid Benefit.
Hetzner offers unbeatable raw compute and RAM value (2x to 4x more resources per dollar compared to DigitalOcean), while DigitalOcean provides a broader suite of developer-friendly managed products (Managed Databases, App Platform, Kubernetes) and a larger North American and Asian footprint.
DigitalOcean and Linode offer nearly identical entry-level pricing ($4-$6/mo for 1GB VPS). Linode excels in raw CPU clock speeds and seamless integration with Akamai’s enterprise CDN and DDoS edge, while DigitalOcean leads in PaaS developer experience and documentation.
DigitalOcean provides predictable, flat-rate pricing with generous bandwidth and minimal overhead, making it ideal for small-to-medium teams. AWS is best suited for complex distributed architectures that require extensive compliance, enterprise IAM, and specialized hardware.
Google Cloud offers superior pricing flexibility with Custom Machine Types and sustained use discounts, whereas Azure is the clear winner for Microsoft ecosystem integration, enterprise active directory, and hybrid cloud environments.
Guides des Instances les Moins Chères par Fournisseur
Foire Aux Questions
Réponses directes aux questions fréquentes sur la tarification et l'infrastructure cloud compute.
Which is cheaper: AWS EC2 or Google Compute Engine? ▼
Base on-demand prices are very close, but GCP can be 15% to 25% cheaper in practice by utilizing Custom Machine Types to avoid paying for excess RAM or CPU cores that your workload does not need.